There is one current debate around constitutional interpretation, happening largely among legal scholars on the right, that should be of interest to the online right wing. Those of you who plan on entering politics at some point, agitating for certain outcomes, or even voting, should be aware of what follows.

Actions become moral, under individual-focused, agency/consent-based morality, when they are desired and the harmful externalities fall under a threshold. But if our desires never come from within, if there is no authenticity, then no decision can be moral because the first requirement is never met.